The Reality of Alternative Energy Initiatives on Local Utility Companies Considered

The more non-performing alternative energy initiatives forced on the Utility companies the higher the cost of energy for everyone. Why? Because most of these green energy schemes are hugely subsidized and thus, increase the cost of our energy, therefore hurting families that are on a budget and making our manufacturing companies less competitive and our small businesses unprofitable.

Now let’s talk about wind generation. The reality is that wind by itself will never be enough and solar would require outrageous numbers of acres to perform what we need. Further, the availability of transmission lines near these projects means additionally lines costing 100s of billions of dollars to supply even 10% of the amount of energy this great nation uses.

There should be a mix of our energy generation, but should have to compete for cost against current methods. Why not challenge our entrepreneurs, innovators, researchers, scientists, and inventors to come up with efficient designs.

Speaking of which there are some on the way that can compete and within 5-years the solar efficiency and cost to produce can compete and beat other forms of energy generation. I say fine, when it makes sense for the environment, cost AND efficiency then go for it. Forcing it before its time will prolong the reality of an alternative energy future.

We should not make alternative energy into a religion, we need to do what works and stop the charade because in the end, survive or fail, we are all on the hook for the whole thing, and we ought to never forget this truth. Think on it.

DIY Green Energy – A Revolutionary Energy Concept to Save the World

Almost every one of us is aware of DIY and its short form,” do it yourself “. Development of an innovative concept finds its seeds in this DIY approach, and hence it is the best way for growth and evolution of new invention and its applications. DIY green energy option is a step, which can help save energy and offer an ecologically conducive energy option to the predominantly fossil derived energy supplied by the power companies.

Now it becomes imperative to describe the fundamentals of green energy. In simple terms, it can be defined as an energy which creates a minimum amount of pollution and accounts for nil emission of carbon gases. Sun, wind, hydro power and geothermal power are the main sources of obtaining green energy. Though the controversy is still raging among scientists, nuclear energy is often included as green energy.

Rising Electricity Bills

Electricity obtained by burning fossils is now the major power source for energy ever since it was discovered by Edison. Our industries, commercial services and houses are dependent upon electricity for smooth functioning.Over the decades, man has invented several appliances for his own comfort which he finds indispensable, and some of these draw heavily on the energy source for their functioning.Added to this, the world population is growing at an alarming rate.Multiply the two factors and you will see the mind boggling requirement of energy. We are so much dependent on this energy source now that, even though the rates have gone up severely and that too very rapidly in the past decade, we are left with no other alternative but to pay the rising bills. Now here is the solution which can put an end to this monopoly of power providing companies. Green energy is feasible, and is an equally efficient and alternative solution. Moreover wind and sunlight, though intermittent, provide unending source of energy without fear of wastage or depletion. Environmentally friendly features, highly economical sources and eternal supplies are the three great virtues of green energy.

Help The Earth Live More!

The avarice of man since his nomadic age is dismaying. This greed has exhausted many of our natural resources like fossils and has brought many others to the brink. At such a stage, the advent and use of DIY green energy is the best and one of the most beneficial options. Using this kind of energy will help the earth gain some time to recover its lost glory, recoup its resources and slow down the process of depletion and ultimately, extinction. Implementing the use of DIY green energy appliances will initiate the process of helping to provide better prospects for our children and ensure a life of quality for the present and future generations. Since the use of conventional energy has affected the environment very negatively, its time now to shift to this very natural and unending source of energy and save our earth from destruction. Can you even imagine the resounding effect of a million homes deciding to implement the DIY green energy scheme?

It is Time To Act Fast!

Starting an energy supply in your backyard or on your terrace can be the first step towards this revolutionary change. Once you get started, your neighbors, relatives and friends and why, even your enemies, will be encouraged and a new cycle of using sustainable energy source will get a flag off.

BCA Green Mark Scheme: What It Is All About? (Abridged Version)

The BCA Green Mark Scheme was launched by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) in January 2005. Supported also by the National Environment Agency, it aims to make Singapore’s built-up environment eco-friendly by awarding four different levels of rating: Green Mark certified, Gold, GoldPLUS, Platinum (previously Silver, Gold, Platinum and Platinum Star) to buildings that meet five key criteria:

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Water Efficiency
  • Site/Project Development & Management (Building Management & Operation for existing buildings)
  • Good Indoor Environmental Quality & Environmental Protection
  • Innovation

The rating given depends on the points garnered under the assessment. Awarded buildings are re-assessed every three years to retain their status. Into its seventh year now, this scheme has evolved to include parks, office interiors and other infrastructure. Currently, it is divided into four categories of infrastructure.

The government’s commitment to promote sustainable development was demonstrated in the master-plan BCA came up with in the second year of the inception of the Green Mark scheme. Named the “1st Green Building Masterplan”, the project introduced several new initiatives to further boost Singapore’s pursuit of a greener living environment. Among which include courses and certification for green building specialists and the imposition of minimum environmental standards – equivalent to the Green Mark Certified level – for all new public sector buildings and buildings undergoing major retrofitting works. Others include a S$20 million Green Mark Incentive Scheme for new buildings and a S$50 million R&D Research Fund to develop green technology. This research move brought forth the first retrofitted Zero-Energy Building in Singapore and Southeast Asia – a flagship BCA’s project. Retrofitting the building – located in the grounds of the BCA academy – is a joint effort by BCA and NUS, in which a three-storey school building was fully equipped with green technology. The building was opened in October 2009.

This master-plan was followed by the “2nd Green Building Masterplan” in 2009. The key objective of the second road-map is to have at least 80% of the buildings in Singapore achieve the Green Mark Certified level by 2030. The plan comprises six strategic thrusts, key initiatives include making it mandatory for all new public sector buildings to attain the Green Mark Platinum status and launching a Green Mark Gross Floor Area (GM GFA) Incentive Scheme, which awards to private developers that earn the Platinum or GoldPLUS accolade, an additional GFA of up to 1% or 2%, respectively, above the Master Plan Gross Plot Ratio (GPR). For developers, a higher GFA means they can build more houses or buildings on the site.

Gross Floor Area (GFA) = Gross Plot Ratio (GPR) x Site Area

Before the GM GFA, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has been introducing various bonus Gross Floor Area incentive schemes to encourage high rise greenery, public artwork promotion, among others. Fearful of excess bulk on a site, in 2009, URA imposed a 10% cap on the additional GFA allowable beyond GPR. Now all development sites cannot have more than 10% additional GFA above the GPR, regardless of the number of bonus GFA incentive schemes they are eligible for.

Perhaps the promotion of the Green Mark scheme abroad has taken off because according to BCA, as of November 2011,”133 overseas projects have been certified, or are seeking Green Mark certification” (“Green Buildings Make Value Propositions”).

Apart from the above incentive schemes to provide financial aid and other incentives to building owners, another two schemes in place are the S$5 million Green Mark Incentive Scheme – Design Prototype (GMIS-DP) and Pilot Building Retrofit Energy Efficiency Financing (BREEF) Scheme. The former provides funding support for developers at the design stage; while the latter provides credit facilities for retrofitting.

To further spur developers to adopt sustainable and energy-efficient development, BCA came up with the Green Mark Champion Awards in 2008 to recognise developers who have demonstrated corporate social responsibility. Under this award, developers that have a number of buildings with Green Mark Gold and above rating are eligible for the Green Mark Champion or Green Mark Platinum.

Thus far, the Green Mark Scheme has proven largely successful judging by the jump in number of buildings certified with a rating. In 2005 and 2006, only 17 buildings were qualified for the award. But this figure skyrocketed to more than 1180 as of May 2012.

So why the motivation by developers to obtain the ratings? Besides the incentives of additional GFA under the Green Mark Gross Floor Area (GM GFA) Incentive Scheme, having a Green Mark reputation can enhance the firm’s competitive edge in overseas ventures. The saving in energy costs will also translate to higher property and rental values.

“A Green Mark Platinum building, for instance, can achieve more than 30% energy-savings compared to a code-compliant building” (“2nd Green Building Masterplan”).

In addition, a joint study on 23 commercial properties, in 2011, by BCA and NUS with six top real estate consultancy firms, revealed that retrofitting commercial buildings with green technologies can cut operating expenses by 10 per cent, on average. While commercial buildings can enjoy capital appreciation of about 2 per cent.

Specifically, the average total saving in energy consumption for a building after retrofitting to attain the standard BCA Green Mark certification can be as high as 17 per cent of its total energy consumption.

Further, retrofitting may not be costly.

“There is now greater awareness in the industry that the upfront cost of retrofitting energy inefficient buildings can be recovered in about 4 to 7 years,” said Mr Quek See Tiat, Chairman, BCA (“BCA-NUS Study shows that Greening Existing Buildings can Increase Property Value”).

It is also estimated that the retrofit cost, expressed as a percentage of the current market value of property, is only 0.5% for retail and 1% for offices.

BCA’s well thought-out green initiatives have been a huge success in creating a win-win situation for different groups in this tiny red dot. For building owners, they gain from the lower maintenance costs. For developers, including green features are done at low costs and with no impact to GPR (due to the bonus GFA incentive schemes), but these features not only enhance the aesthetic beauty of the buildings, they also translate to reputation boost and higher property values. For the community at large, they get to enjoy healthier living spaces. Singapore is living proof that sustainable, green living is possible within an urban jungle.


1. Building and Construction Authority Newsroom, “BCA-NUS Study shows that Greening Existing Buildings can Increase Property Value”, 16 Sep 2011, Web